Global Journal of Politics and Law Research (GJPLR)

EA Journals

Court of Cassation’s Control over Interpretation of Rules of the Foreign Law by the National Judge According to the Jordanian Legislation

Abstract

This study examines court of cassation’s control over interpretation of rules of the foreign law by the national judge. The study concludes that some legalsystems prohibit control over interpretation of the legal provisions by the high court except in some exceptional circumstances like causation. Other legal systems provide for control over interpretation of rules of the foreign law by the national judge. These systems provide for such control either expressly in legislation or through applications of the high court that evidently indicate to this principle. In this context, the Jordanian legislator does not expressly require permissibility of imposing control of the Jordanian court of cassation over rules of the foreign law by the Jordanian trial judge. Further, some decisions issued by court of cassation indicate that the foreign law will maintain its legal capacity before the Jordanian courts and that it should be dealt with equally as the Jordanian law.

Keywords: Interpretation, court of Cassation, foreign rules, national judge, public system

cc logo

This work by European American Journals is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License

 

Recent Publications

Email ID: editor.gjplr@ea-journals.org
Impact Factor: 7.71
Print ISSN: 2053-6321
Online ISSN: 2053-6593
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/gjplr.2013

Author Guidelines
Submit Papers
Review Status

 

Scroll to Top

Don't miss any Call For Paper update from EA Journals

Fill up the form below and get notified everytime we call for new submissions for our journals.